Template:Did you know nominations/I Know What You'll Do Next Summer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

I Know What You'll Do Next Summer

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that "I Know What You'll Do Next Summer", an episode of Veronica Mars, includes a public service announcement for Invisible Children, Inc. after the installment's conclusion?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Back to Dust

Improved to Good Article status by Johanna (talk). Self-nominated at 18:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC).

• The article was recently improved to GA status by the nominator (on March 4). The hook is sourced (in a ref published by BuzzFeed) and interesting. QPQ needed. -- Frankie _talk 19:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

• @FrB.TG: QPQ supplied. Let me know if you have any other concerns. Thanks. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 17:00, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

-- Frankie _talk 11:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

• @Frankie: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Isn't my review above the tick and the nominator's reply sufficient enough? Oh, and you have pinged wrong user. -- Frankie _talk 06:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

• All you mentioned in your review was the newness and hook citation. You did not mention whether you checked for length, neutrality, or close paraphrasing. Yoninah (talk) 18:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I am going to list hereafter every criterion so that this does not happen every time I review a nomination:

1. New (promoted to good article status) Y
2. Long enough (more than 1500 characters) Y
3. Neutral, verifiable and is free of close paraphrasing and plagiarism. Y
4. Hook is interesting and verifiable (through a ref published by Buzzfeed) Y
5. QPQ Y
6. Image (not needed for that one as I fail to see one) Y

• You're great. Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 19:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)