Template:Did you know nominations/IMbesharam
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 10:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
IMbesharam
- ... that 54% of customers of IMbesharam, an Indian ecommerce website that sells sexual wellness products, are women? Source: Among the company's customers, 54% were women and 46% were men.
- ALT1: ... that in 2022, 54% of customers of Indian sexual wellness products retailer IMbesharam were women? Source: Among the company's customers, 54% were women and 46% were men.
- Reviewed:
Created by CometVolcano (talk). Self-nominated at 12:11, 13 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/IMbesharam; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Hook could be rewritten to say the customers are "mostly women", which is more interesting. Article has a copyvio problem and is an orphan. Zanahary (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have reworded the problematic parts. CometVolcano (talk) 08:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- ALT3: ... that most customers of IMbesharam, an Indian ecommerce website that sells sexual wellness products, are women? Source: Among the company's customers, 54% were women and 46% were men.
- ALT34: ... that customers of IMbesharam, an Indian ecommerce website that sells sexual wellness products, are mostly women? Source: Among the company's customers, 54% were women and 46% were men.
After a copyright violation was removed, the article is full of maintenance tags and is no longer long enough. In fact, it's still (or again) a stub, and DYK does not run stub. This thus fails DYK criteria on three fronts. Sorry. Schwede66 04:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)