Template:Did you know nominations/Hwahyejang
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of Hwahyejang's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Ashwin147 (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC).
DYK toolbox |
---|
Hwahyejang
[edit]- ... that a Hwahyejang (traditional Korean shoemaker) can take as long as a week to create a single pair of shoes?
- Reviewed: Max Reinhart
Created by Yunshui (talk). Self nominated at 14:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC).
- The review is being done. The issues/concerns will be listed below. It is requested to notify the reviewer (using {{Talkback}} or {{Whisperback}}) after addressing the issues.
- Issues
The article is uncategorized. I have added a template. Please fix the issue! --Tito Dutta (contact) 23:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Whoops; thanks for picking that up Tito. I've added cats and project tagged it. Cheers, Yunshui 雲水 07:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC).
- 1780+ characters, created 9 April, Slight confusion: article mentions seven days and the referred article states three to seven days! --Tito Dutta (contact) 07:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- The source does indeed say three to seven days, but "three to seven" is equivalent to "up to seven" if no lower boundary is specified - given that the hook uses "as long as", making the maximum time more pertinent than the minimum, seven is the appropriate upper limit boundary. IMHO, anyway. Yunshui 雲水 07:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why it was "slight confusion"! :) I have checked other issues like close paraphrasing, copyvio (not found), QPQ done! Good to go! --Tito Dutta (contact) 08:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- The source does indeed say three to seven days, but "three to seven" is equivalent to "up to seven" if no lower boundary is specified - given that the hook uses "as long as", making the maximum time more pertinent than the minimum, seven is the appropriate upper limit boundary. IMHO, anyway. Yunshui 雲水 07:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- 1780+ characters, created 9 April, Slight confusion: article mentions seven days and the referred article states three to seven days! --Tito Dutta (contact) 07:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)