The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Overall: A useful article; thank you for this. As far as I can see, the nominator does not yet have 5 DYKs, therefore there is no need to do a QPQ (by the way, the link includes only a suggested ALT, not a review). I have rephrased one sentence which will not affect the DYK process. Storye book (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2022 (UTC)