Template:Did you know nominations/Hudson Terminal

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by DanCherek (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hudson Terminal

(

)

... that New York City's Hudson Terminal was constructed as two buildings after the city government would not allow the closure of a street between the two structures? Source: Landau, Sarah; Condit, Carl W. (1996). Rise of the New York Skyscraper, 1865–1913. Yale University Press. p. 326
- ALT1:... that a vacant building at New York City's Hudson Terminal was set on fire just before it was demolished to make way for the World Trade Center? Source: Lee, Vincent (April 16, 1972). "Chiefs Play Arson in Skyscraper". New York Daily News. p. 232.
- ALT2:... that New York City's Hudson Terminal, once billed as the world's largest office building by floor area, was demolished as part of an agreement to develop the World Trade Center? Source: (1) "Hudson Tube Terminal Plans Are Announced; Largest Office Building in the World at Manhattan End". The New York Times. December 23, 1906. (2) Burks, Edward C. (October 19, 1971). "World Trade Center Rising In Noisy, Confusing World". The New York Times. Technically it was 2 buildings, but was billed as one.
- ALT3:... that the last remnant of New York City's Hudson Terminal, which had been replaced by the World Trade Center, was removed after the World Trade Center was destroyed? Source: Dunlap, David W. (October 26, 2008). "Another Ghost from Ground Zero's Past Fades Away". The New York Times

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sandra Wolin

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 21:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Epicgenius, QPQ needed. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Thanks for the review. I have done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)