Template:Did you know nominations/Hualca Hualca

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Hualca Hualca

(

)

Hualca Hualca volcano

... that some inhabitants of the Colca Canyon believe that their ancestors came from Hualca Hualca (pictured) volcano? In 1586, the ethnic lords of the ancient Cavana polity told a Spanish crown official that their ancestors emerged from Hualca-Hualca Mountain, the source of their irrigation water.
- ALT1:... that Hualca Hualca volcano (pictured) inflated itself during the early 21th century and ending in 1997?

Reviewed: Achilles (opera)

5x expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 15:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC).

-->New enough, long enough of an article, the article has been 5x expanded (at least), fits Wikipedia policy for neutrality and other issues, and the author has done a QPQ. The hook is the right length and interesting, but I don't know that it's completely accurate. It says that some inhabitants believe (present tense) and then the source is about what residents believeD (past tense) in 1586. I would change the wording of the hook slightly or find a more recent source to prove that inhabitants do still believe this. Also, I would fix the caption on the photo to say something like "Hualca Hualca volcano" or something instead of just "the mountain." After these changes I think it should be good to go. Kmwebber (talk) 19:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Kmwebber
@Kmwebber: This source does support that it applied more recently, but since it explicitly refers to an anecdote ("When I was a child, my grandparents said we all descended from Hualca Hualca but no one believes that anymore. Really, the Majes Canal has changed all this.") I am not certain if that would work. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: I think that given that info it will be good to go. That was recent enough that I think it should be fine. It's such an interesting fact that I don't think it's worth it to stop the general public from knowing it because of a weird technicality. Given all this I think the whole thing is good to go! I went ahead and changed the caption. Kmwebber (talk) 23:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Kmwebber