Template:Did you know nominations/Howard Wiest
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Keilana|Parlez ici 04:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Howard Wiest
[edit]- ... that Howard Wiest never finished high school or attended law school and became Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Fred Phillips (makeup artist)
- Comment: New article
Created/expanded by 7&6=thirteen (☎). RFD (talk), Self-nominated at 12:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC).
- Article is big enough and new enough. Neutrally written. All except the lede is referenced (that would normally be OK but...) Hook is in the article. But this fact about not attending law school is unreferenced,
and I cannot see it in the obituary. QPQ performed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Reply Apparently you missed this obituary which explicitly says he had no formal college training in the law. "Without the benefit of a college legal training, Wiest rose from a youthful steamfitters job and became known as one of the unique characters of Michigan jurisprudence." "Associate Justice of Michigan Dies: Wiest Was Oldest Member of State's Highest Tribunal". Ironwood Daily Globe. Ironwood, Michigan. September 17, 1945. p. 2. Retrieved August 10, 2015.7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good that reference is suitable, so on the "nor attended law school" clause can you add that ref please? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Graeme Bartlett, Reference and quotation is already there. See Note A, Upper alpha. I also added it as a reference to the "never attended law school", which I hope satisfies you and your concern. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- now good to go as the hook fact is cited. Hook is also short enough. Good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Graeme Bartlett, Reference and quotation is already there. See Note A, Upper alpha. I also added it as a reference to the "never attended law school", which I hope satisfies you and your concern. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good that reference is suitable, so on the "nor attended law school" clause can you add that ref please? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Article is big enough and new enough. Neutrally written. All except the lede is referenced (that would normally be OK but...) Hook is in the article. But this fact about not attending law school is unreferenced,