Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Hoochie Coochie Man

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Hoochie Coochie Man

[edit]
(
)
  • Reviewed: Second self-nominated DYK (QPQ not required)

Improved to Good Article status by Ojorojo (talk). Self nominated at 16:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Full review needed. (Previous reviewer never returned.) BlueMoonset (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Review Good to go! Promoted to GA. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely. QPQ not required. Article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report :The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. While I did not have access to the off line sources, I WP:AGF, and not that they also had been reviewed by the GA reviewer. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. This hook is as good as any one of the many others that are possible. Beautiful and meticulous article on an interesting subject — this is a Blues standard. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 05:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Hoochie_Coochie_Man&oldid=640835413"