The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Overall: Two statements need clarification or removal: 1) the date for the 440 employees figure (recommend using {{as of}}), and 2) the cost of the 1959 renovation (or the word "costly" can just be removed). Issues resolved. Otherwise, everything looks in order. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 14:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to the article Swpb. The "440" figure is from current web source so I've used "As of 2023". I deleted the "costly" as I couldn't find a precise value. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment: QPQ not required as nominated on behalf of Naomi Hennig (translator from the German), who has no previous English DYK. Expanded 17-22 March.