The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Overall: Info for hook is contained in two consecutive sentences followed by a cite, but why niggle? Editor could just as easily use a semi-colon to join the sentences and fulfill the letter of the core requirement, so why be silly about this? This article is GTG. I might add that an article about the judiciary that cogently and pithily explains importance of legal decisions in layman's terms is a very nice addition to our cathedral of knowledge here.Georgejdorner (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Info for hook is contained in two consecutive sentences followed by a cite, but why niggle? Editor could just as easily use a semi-colon to join the sentences and fulfill the letter of the core requirement, so why be silly about this? This article is GTG. I might add that an article about the judiciary that cogently and pithily explains importance of legal decisions in layman's terms is a very nice addition to our cathedral of knowledge here.Georgejdorner (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)