The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Overall: New enough, long enough, sourced and neutral. Hook is (very) interesting in my opinion. The url cited for the DYK hook doesn't work for me, so I'll AGF. QPQ is not needed as the nominator only has four DYK noms. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)