Template:Did you know nominations/Hearst Tower (Manhattan)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 04:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Hearst Tower (Manhattan)

(

)

Hearst Tower

... that the Hearst Tower (pictured) was built nearly eight decades after its base was completed? Source: White, Norval; Willensky, Elliot & Leadon, Fran (2010). AIA Guide to New York City (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 308.
- ALT1:... that the Hearst Magazine Building was constructed as the base of a tower that was not built for nearly eight decades? Source: White, Norval; Willensky, Elliot & Leadon, Fran (2010). AIA Guide to New York City (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 308.
- ALT2:... that a window cleaning system for the Hearst Tower (pictured) took three years and cost $3 million to plan? Source: New Yorker 2013
- ALT3:... that the Hearst Magazine Building is the only survivor of an unbuilt entertainment complex envisioned around New York City's Columbus Circle in the early 20th century? Source: Nash, Eric (2005). "Hearst Magazine Building (originally International Magazine Building)". Manhattan skyscrapers. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. p. 45.
- ALT4:... that work on New York City's Hearst Tower (pictured) proceeded after the September 11 attacks because the Hearst Corporation's board believed "If we don't do anything, [the terrorists] have won"? Source: NY Daily News

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pre-game ceremony
Comment: For ALT1/3 I optionally suggest File:HearstMagazineBuilding.JPG as an image.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC).

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Recently expanded, interesting hooks, and I see no problems preventing this from becoming a DYK. Good job! @Epicgenius: Just ping me when you get done with the QPQ Jon698 (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

@Jon698: Thanks for the review. I've done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 19:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)