The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Looks good, and an interesting topic! — Wug·a·po·des 03:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
@Wugapodes: Thanks for your review! Just to be clear, this is my sixth DYK nomination so it's my first needing a QPQ. I've done my part here and am waiting for a second opinion on that nomination, which I assume needs to be completed before the QPQ is considered done. Let me know if I'm mistaken or if there's anything else I need to do. Thanks again! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
@DrOrinScrivello: Seems the QPQ Check tool lied to me then, I'll take your word for it. The review looks good and I left a note on that nomination as well. Once you come to a decision on that nom, then this one should be good to go. — Wug·a·po·des 18:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
@Wugapodes: The tool did not tell a lie, my fifth nomination is in the pipeline and was submitted earlier than this one, it just hasn't hit the main page yet. I appreciate your advice on the other review, and I've marked it good to go. Thanks again! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)