Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Hammond House (Hawthorne, New York)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Matty.007 11:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Not sure why there are two reviews, but should be twice as safe.

Hammond House (Hawthorne, New York)

[edit]

East view of house, 2013

5x expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self nominated at 19:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC).

  • 5× expansion of 6 July 2013 version completed from 493 characters to 12,000+ and nominated 5 days later. Duplication detector check of online sources [1][2][3][4][5] and quick read through the others (that either can't go through Dup detector or don't contain prose) reveal no close paraphrasing issues (waiving direct quotes and applying WP:LIMITED). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 174 characters long (ALT1 is 188; ALT2 is 155); all three are under the 200 character max. limit and are interesting. Image is free and in public domain. Refs 2 (verifying ALT2), 3 (verifying main), and 4–6 (verifying ALT1) are all reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • The article exceeds 1,500 characters. The article history indicates the expansion of 5x began on July 4. If July 6 is taken as the start date, then the expansion is much less than 5 times. I think July 4 is correct and the 5x expansion is OK. Other than that, I found the article content interesting and the base hook grabbed my attention. It is accurate, and has an in-line citation, The two alternates did not really grab my interest, so I vote for keeping the original hook. I don't see any plagiarism or copyright vios. The image is free of copyright issues. I haven't done a QPQ search, but I notice that the author's page indicates he has many many credits for DYK nominations. I think the nomination should go forward. Bruin2 (talk) 16:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)