Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/HP Stream 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

HP Stream 7

[edit]

5x expanded by SSTflyer (talk). Self-nominated at 04:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Edits from December 13-16 brought it from about 157 to 1823 characters, more info was added after that by Spike-from-NH so the current article is even longer. Article is written well enough and the hook is sourced, is interesting due to the relatively low sale price for this type of product. QPQ done. TaylorMoore2 (talk) 17:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  • The hook seems more like a catalog item than a hook. How about:
  • ALT1: ... that the HP Stream 7, launched for US$119, has sold for as low as $79? Yoninah (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
  • I do not oppose the hook suggested by Yoninah, but a new reviewer is required to check this hook. sst (top/bottom) (edits) 10:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Reviewer should do a full review, since the original reviewer is a blocked sockpuppet. BlueMoonset (talk) 09:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
  • New review: 5x expanded, all sources check out without close paraphrasing, every statement is sourced. I think the hook could still use some work. I don't know what the heck a HP Stream 7 is just from the hook; please at least tell me that it's a tablet computer. Other than that, I see no other issues. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
  • How about:
  • ALT2: .. that the HP Stream 7 tablet computer, which has sold for as low as $79, was called the "best tablet at its price point"?" Axem Titanium (talk) 08:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  • That does sound good. However, the quote doesn't appear in the source, and in fact, other quotes attributed to footnote 4 don't appear in the source. Perhaps the URL was changed? Pinging @SSTflyer:. Yoninah (talk) 10:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  • The footnote specifically states that the material is attributed to page 7 of the review, which is the last page. sst 11:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks, now I see it. Too bad they don't have a version that you could view on one page. ALT2 hook ref verified and cited inline. I'll go ahead and approve Axem Titanium's hook. Rest of review per Axem Titanium. Yoninah (talk) 15:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)