Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Spiteful (1899)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

HMS Spiteful (1899)

[edit]
HMS Spiteful under way
HMS Spiteful under way
  • Reviewed: This is my first submission for DYK
  • Comment: Per the quoted citation in the article, the source of the hook fact can be found in Scientific American: Anon. (1904). "The British Admiralty ..." Scientific American. 91 (2): 27. ISSN 0036-8733. Improved to Good Article status by Nortonius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC).
  • Review Newly promoted to GA. New enough, long enough. Earwig is clear. No close paraphrasing or copy vio. No policy issues. Picture is ca. 1900 and in public domain in Commons with proper license; clear at 100 pix. Hook is supported by cited inline sources. It is accurate and neutral, and avoids the more complicated problems associated with naval adaptation of fuel oil (see Note 17). QPQ not required (first nomination). 7&6=thirteen () 14:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Just to note that the numbering of [foot]notes has changed, an almost inevitable consequence of ongoing editing – while the number of the footnote in question has changed to 21 at the time of writing, it begins "Merchant and smaller naval vessels had previously used fuel oil, but ..." Nortonius (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)