Template:Did you know nominations/Greenland shark
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Does not qualify for DYK as noted below.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Greenland shark
[edit]
Greenland shark
- ... that ...The Greenland shark has the longest known lifespan of all vertebrate species.[1] In 2016, a study based on 28 specimens that ranged from 81 to 502 cm (2.7–16.5 ft) in length determined by radiocarbon dating that the oldest of the animals that they sampled, had lived for 392 ± 120 years (a minimum of 272 years and a maximum of 512 years). The authors further concluded that the species reaches sexual maturity at about 150 years of age.[1][2]
Created by Kh80 (talk). Nominated by Pvmoutside (talk) at 05:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC).
References
- ^ a b Nielsen, Julius; Hedeholm, Rasmus B.; Heinemeier, Jan; Bushnell, Peter G.; Christiansen, Jørgen S.; Olsen, Jesper; Ramsey, Christopher Bronk; Brill, Richard W.; Simon, Malene; Steffensen, Kirstine F.; Steffensen, John F. (2016). "Eye lens radiocarbon reveals centuries of longevity in the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus)". Science. 353 (6300): 702–4. doi:10.1126/science.aaf1703. PMID 27516602.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|lay-date=ignored (help); Unknown parameter|lay-source=ignored (help); Unknown parameter|lay-url=ignored (help) - ^ Pennisi, Elizabeth (11 August 2016). "Greenland Shark May Live 400 Years, Smashing Longevity Record". Science Magazine.
Sorry Pvmoutside, but Greenland shark has been on the front page before (in the news) and is not new enough (not recently created, 5x expanded, or brought to GA status). Umimmak (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about the nomination.......I re-read the qualifications. I thought new meant a new nomination, not a new article. This clearly does not qualify....Pvmoutside (talk) 13:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
