Template:Did you know nominations/Godzilla Megamullion
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Godzilla Megamullion
The Godzilla Megamullion marked on an elevation map
- ... that the Godzilla Megamullion is ten times larger than any other known megamullion? Source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/iar.12116 quote: "The Godzilla Megamullion is approximately 10 times larger in area than the other known OCCs"
- ALT1: ... that Godzilla Megamullion is named after Godzilla due to its large size and has 14 features named after the monster's body parts? https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/iar.12116 quotes: "the Godzilla Megamullion was easily recognized from these previous studies, as the largest OCC on the Earth with its areal dimensions of approximately 125 km× 55 km. The Godzilla Megamullion is approximately 10 times larger in area than the other known OCCs (Ohara et al. 2001), and hence it is named after the famous monster in the films (Ohara et al. 2003a, 2003b)." "Furthermore, we gave 13 names to the individual topographic elements of the Godzilla Megamullion, imitating the body parts of the famous monster in the films (Harigane et al. 2010, 2011a, 2011b; Loocke et al. 2013; Ohara 2012) (Fig. 3a). In 2011, we employed one additional name (i.e., Hat Ridge), resulting in 14 individual names (Fig. 3a)." "Fig. 3 (a) Bathymetric map of the Godzilla Megamullion and its adjacent area. The map is modified after Ohara (2012). The bathymetric data are from various sources mainly from the first phase extended continental shelf survey program (Ohara et al., 2001). The 14 individual names for the specific elements of the Godzilla Megamullion and the conjugate crust are shown (Harigane et al. 2010, 2011a, 2011b; " (Fig 3a has the individual names, like "South Tail Rise")
- ALT2: ... that the Godzilla Megamullion has 14 features named after the monster's body parts? https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/iar.12116 quotes: "Furthermore, we gave 13 names to the individual topographic elements of the Godzilla Megamullion, imitating the body parts of the famous monster in the films (Harigane et al. 2010, 2011a, 2011b; Loocke et al. 2013; Ohara 2012) (Fig. 3a). In 2011, we employed one additional name (i.e., Hat Ridge), resulting in 14 individual names (Fig. 3a)." "Fig. 3 (a) Bathymetric map of the Godzilla Megamullion and its adjacent area. The map is modified after Ohara (2012). The bathymetric data are from various sources mainly from the first phase extended continental shelf survey program (Ohara et al., 2001). The 14 individual names for the specific elements of the Godzilla Megamullion and the conjugate crust are shown (Harigane et al. 2010, 2011a, 2011b; " (Fig 3a has the individual names, like "South Tail Rise")
- Reviewed: This is my first DYK!
Created by Fulmard (talk). Self-nominated at 08:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC).
- Fulmard Original hook interesting (I tweaked grammar) - no copyvio. Please could you add a quote in the cite for "ten times" as I don't have access to the full article. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- User:Chidgk1, I added quotes for all the hooks. Which one do you think is best?Fulmard (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Fulmard I prefer the original followed by ALT2 as I think they are snappier than ALT1. Please could you clarify the points in the article I did not understand and marked "clarify". Chidgk1 (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- User:Chidgk1, so the first one it is. I think I resolved all the clarify points, did I miss one? The last one was a spelling error I was missing a space, fixed that, and linked plagioclase.Fulmard (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Fulmard I prefer the original followed by ALT2 as I think they are snappier than ALT1. Please could you clarify the points in the article I did not understand and marked "clarify". Chidgk1 (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Shortened cite - approving - excellent article 
Chidgk1 (talk) 06:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P7