Template:Did you know nominations/Glasser v. United States

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 00:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Glasser v. United States

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Glasser v. United States was both the first U.S. Supreme Court case to hold that an attorney conflict of interest violated the Assistance of Counsel Clause and the first case to hold that juries must be drawn from a "cross-section of the community"?

Created/expanded by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 03:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

• Reviewed: Washington v. Texas
• Article is new and meets all DYK criteria. Only problem here is that the hook is too long. It may not be possible to include both "firsts" in this hook and keep it under 200 characters. ALT1 is closer, but still over 200. IAR? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
• ALT1 ... that Glasser v. United States was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to hold that an attorney conflict of interest violated the Assistance of Counsel Clause and that juries must be drawn from a "cross-section of the community"?