Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Gilmore Oil Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Gilmore the lion, Gilmore Oil Company

[edit]
  • Reviewed: Bernardo De Pace and Unity of the intellect as two reviews are required for a double hook, I believe.
  • Comment: The hook can be confirmed online at the Smithsonian. This is a double nomination and I plan further expansion of the two articles but this should do to get started.

Created by Andrew Davidson (talk) and Rmattconard (talk). Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk) at 23:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC).

  • OK the lion is good, with help from Yngvadottir. On to the next. Drmies (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
  • So both are long enough, new enough, and plagiarism-free enough, and the image seems free enough. User:Andrew Davidson, there's a cn-tag on the oil company article I need you to take care of: I couldn't find that in the Wallach book. And please have a look at my other edits. Drmies (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I'm pressed for time currently and so will have to do this in stages but will get to it soon, I hope. Andrew D. (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

It's ready for another look now. Andrew D. (talk) 13:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The oil company seems okay now: all sources are offline so I'm assuming good faith on its content. There's just a slight catch with the nomination: on the lion article, it mentions that his remains are in cold storage, but the source provided doesn't explicitly say this: it only says that his remains are either in storage or on loan. A better source for the storage thing might be needed here, or that the article needs to be rephrased saying that his remains are "listed as on loan or in storage". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)