The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Overall: Sources checked via spot checks; AGF per GA. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 07:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Promoter's note to @IceWelder: Hi there! Thanks for reviewing this nom :) in the future, do note that the DYK criteria doesn't accept an article's GA status as an automatic pass for any checks – it's not uncommon for a GA-based nomination to turn up a few problems the reviewer might have missed. Something to keep in mind for next time! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)