Template:Did you know nominations/Georg Karo

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 11:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Georg Karo

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Jewish-German Georg Karo was accused of being a Nazi spy after fleeing Nazi persecution? Source: Davis, Jack L. (2010). ""That Special Atmosphere Outside of National Boundaries": Three Jewish Directors and the American School of Classical Studies at Athens". Annuario della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Atene. 87: 119–131, esp. p. 127
  • ALT1: ... that the archaeologist Georg Karo initially considered that he "only embarrassed himself" when studying the subject? Source: Ehling, Kay (2019). "Archäeologe und Gentleman: Georg Karo in den Zwanziger Jahren" [Archaeologist and Gentleman: Georg Karo in the Twenties]. Antike Welt (in German). 6: 53–60. JSTOR 26918891., p. 54
  • ALT2: ... that the archaeologist Georg Karo won the favour of both German and Greek royalty? Source: Gerber, Albrecht (2010). Deissmann the Philologist. Berlin: De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-022431-3, p. 133-134 (German); Marchand, Suzanne (2008) [1996]. "Kultur and the World War". In Murray, Tim; Evans, Christopher (eds.). Histories of Archaeology: A Reader in the History of Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 238–278. ISBN 978-0-19-955008-1, p. 261 (Greek)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mohammed Khalid Roashan

5x expanded by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Self-nominated at 09:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Georg Karo; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• @UndercoverClassicist: Very interesting hook indeed. I think the original hook is the most interesting. There appears to be no problems with the article, and the hook matches the article. Unfortunately I had a bit of difficulty accessing the source so I'll accept with good faith. Not yet though, as your QPQ isn't complete. —Panamitsu (talk) 04:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks - that one's waiting on the nominator, but I since did Template:Did you know nominations/Tournament of Kings: could we count that one as the QPQ in this case instead? UndercoverClassicist ^T·C 07:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
    • Driveby comment: incomplete reviews of this sort (a full review has been done but there's haggling over hooks/image licensing/otherwise something keeping the article at DYKN for now) are generally accepted for QPQs. Vaticidalprophet 08:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

• Oh whoops. Accepting the first QPQ, you are free to use the second one for another nomination. —Panamitsu (talk) 08:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)