Template:Did you know nominations/Gauthierite
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gauthierite
Assembly of gauthierite crystals on matrix
- ... that the mineral gauthierite (pictured) has only been found in one location, and only on very few specimens? Source: T. A. Olds, J. Plášil, A. R. Kampf, R. Škoda, P. C. Burns, J. Čejka, V. Bourgoin and J.-C. Boulliard: Gauthierite, KPb[(UO2)7O5(OH)7]·8H2O, a new uranyl-oxide hydroxy-hydrate mineral from Shinkolobwe with a novel uranyl-anion sheet-topology In: European Journal of Mineralogy 2017, 20, 129–141
Created by Klaproth (talk). Self-nominated at 12:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gauthierite; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I will be reviewing. Hey, @Klaproth: please look at your QPQ and assign it an approval, maybe, or other rating. I could not determine the outcome of that review and do not wish to deprive that nomination's editor of a clear answer before moving forward here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: given that the submitted QPQ has been approved and slotted into prep in the days since, I would imagine that concern is resolved :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Thank you Leeky; missed that there had been a development. As always, you're more on top of it than anyone. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Verified as many facts as I could but could not access the source that references much of the article. I have no reason to doubt accuracy considering the other material lining up with what I could find in the viewable sources. QPQ done, great photo (love seeing something like this being an own-work), and hook is interesting. Article is short but comprehensive in view of the mineral's recent discovery. Overall, great work, Klaproth! You have inspired me to write about a localized mineral-related topic for an article I hope to complete in the next month! ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Thank you Leeky; missed that there had been a development. As always, you're more on top of it than anyone. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: given that the submitted QPQ has been approved and slotted into prep in the days since, I would imagine that concern is resolved :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
