Template:Did you know nominations/Ganjar Pranowo
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Closed at nominator's request
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ganjar Pranowo
- ... that the current Governor of Central Java, Ganjar Pranowo (pictured), accidentally liked and shared a porn video on his Twitter account? Source: "Saya pernah nggak sengaja mencet, terus kemudian saya nggak sengaja ngirim."[I once accidentally clicked [the like button] and sent a porn video [to my twitter account] [ https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20191205102525-20-454344/budayawan-ganjar-pranowo-tidak-etis-soal-suka-film-porno]. Context for the quote see [1].
- ALT1:... that the current Governor of Central Java, Ganjar Pranowo (pictured), can't find anything wrong with watching porn films since he is an adult? Source: "If I watch porn, what is wrong with that? I like it. I am an adult. I have a wife,” -[2]
- ALT2:... that the Governor of Central Java, Ganjar Pranowo (pictured), once gave a laptop to a student who admitted watching porn? Source: ["The student admitted that he watches porn. You know? [I] gave him a laptop.", said Ganjar.] "Siswa itu mengaku menonton film porno hanya sekadar bereksplorasi. ... You know?. Kamu saya kasih laptop," tegas Ganjar." - [3]
- Comment: Most of the videos on his channel are CC licensed. A more hooky face would be appreciated.
5x expanded by Khalif Ali Husain the Third (talk). Nominated by Jeromi Mikhael at 09:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- / - Neutral: - /
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting: - /
- Other problems: - /
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article: - /
- Clear at 100px: - /
QPQ: 
- /
This nomination has a lot of issues unfortunately. There are a couple of paragraphs with no sources, and it might not be neutral because it spends so much time on the porn controversy. I'm not sure if there should be so much weight on that. The hooks are cited but they're a little bit of a BLP issue because they're all about the porn.
The photo is pretty blurry and not in the article. I'm not sure why because there's a lot of really good professional photos already on the page (and they're free to use). QPQ also has to be done since the nominator has over 5 dyk credits.
The page was recently expanded and is long enough, so if those issues can be fixed within a few days the nomination can be approved but if not it's better to reject it now.
- @BuySomeApples: Nope, just close it now. Go ahead Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 00:59, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
This needs to be closed per the nominator's request. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)