Template:Did you know nominations/Gang of Four (pro-Contra)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Gang of Four (pro-Contra)
[edit]- ... that the 1980s "Gang of Four" consisted of Democratic critics of the Vietnam War who advocated Congressional funding for the Nicaraguan Contras?
- Reviewed: Afterburn (film)
Created/expanded by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk). Self nom at 20:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
missed 5 day limit by 20 hours. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ouch! Consider rounding by truncation:
- Round_t( 5 20/24= 5 5/6 ) =5 < 6.
- Kiefer.Wolfowitz 21:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hook is 146 characters, short enough, factual and interesting enough. However the article title is only referenced by a primary source, written by one of the members. There is no third party reference to confirm the title was used. Apart from that the article is long enough, adequately referenced and neutral point of view. So what we need is another reference or two to confirm this Gang of Four is notable and that the term was used by others. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Graeme! Thanks for the 2nd look.
- Mother Jones ran an article which is visible here. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Massing, Michael (October 1987). "Contra aides: Why four Democratic operatives enlisted in Ollie North's crusade". Mother Jones: 23–26, 40–43.
I think you have messed the referencing in the article, take a second look. But at least Reference contains the term. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching my error, which is now corrected. I again forgot to insert "harvtxt" in the harvtxt-template. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
confirmed reference fixed, good to go! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching my error, which is now corrected. I again forgot to insert "harvtxt" in the harvtxt-template. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
