The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Review pending - Also, I made two small edits to this article back in October, but didn't begin expansion until a week ago. My understanding is that it's still "new", but correct me if I'm wrong.
Overall: 2nd time 2O welcome please ping Geardona (talk to me?) 02:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
@Geardona: Thanks for the review. To be clear, this is my seventh DYK nom so does require a QPQ, which is forthcoming. If you're interested in a second opinion on your review, you want to use the 'subst:DYK?again' template prior to approval. I'm honestly not sure if that can be done once the review is in the Approved queue or not, though. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
@DrOrinScrivello: We shall see, if you get the QPQ done before it is placed into the actual queue by a helper, it shouldn't be a problem, as for the second opinion, it was just indicating that if I did something wrong, correct me. Geardona (talk to me?) 18:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
@Geardona: I have added my QPQ, so this should be good to go now. Thanks again. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)