Template:Did you know nominations/Fulham Refuge
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fulham Refuge
[edit]
Fulham Refuge, 1858
- ... that Fulham Refuge (pictured) was the "most distinctively feminine of the early convict prisons"? Source: [1] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Reviewed: RapidRide G Line
Created by Edwardx (talk), Paul W (talk), and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 23:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- The sentence starting "The site included a large block ..." is too close to the Archaeology Data Service's version.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
- to be done
Overall: 
Looks like a pleasant place and so it's a shame it was closed. Thanks for getting it started. Andrew D. (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, Andrew D. I've copyedited the offending sentence. QPQ review now done. Added (pictured) to the hook. I took some photos today of what is left (what I understand to be the prison laundry, long since converted to flats), and will add one or two to the article, but this will not affect your review! Edwardx (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
As the issues raised in the review have been aaddressed and checked, the hook is ready to proceed. Andrew D. (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)