Template:Did you know nominations/Frankfurt silver inscription
Appearance
DYK toolbox |
---|
Frankfurt silver inscription
- ... that an antique inscription from Germany has been read by "unrolling" it virtually?
- ALT1: ... that the first known follower of Christianity north of the Alps came from Frankfurt am Main? Source: https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/archaeology-around-the-world/article-833093
- ALT2: ... that a recently discovered amulet may rewrite the history of Christianity? Source: https://greekreporter.com/2024/12/13/early-christian-inscription-northern-europe-rewrite-history/
- ALT3: ... that prior to the recent discovery of an exclusively Christian inscription, all similar examples also invoked Germanic deities? Source: https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/237124/11-12-2024/aufregender-fund-frankfurt-geschichte-des-christentums-neu-schreiben
- ALT4: ... that archeologists read an antique inscription from Germany by "unrolling" it virtually? Source: https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/nation-world/world/article296997439.html
- ALT5: ... that an amulet discovered in a Roman cemetery in Germany contains the earliest known written use of the Trisagion? Source: https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/archaeology-around-the-world/article-833093
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This discovery is currently in the news, as it was announced just two days ago. I considered nominating it for WP:ITN, but I think it suites DYK better. Without the qualifier "from Germany" (in main hook and ALT4), readers may assume this to be about the more well known Herculaneum papyri, which were featured in DYK 13 years ago (25 August 2011).
Created by Renerpho (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Renerpho (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2024 (UTC).
- Comment The article by Huld-Zetsche [1] isn't available online (all the other references are). This is actually the exact same source used to create this map. Renerpho (talk) 10:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Fascinating piece of archaeology. Hook facts are interesting and cited. Article is new enough and long enough, neutral. Earwig does not show any concerns, though AGF on German references. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)