The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 13:54, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
... that Hollywood studio head Frank Price's decision to film Ghostbusters (1983) was initially considered a "terrible mistake" by industry insiders but it became a major hit? (Source: [1])
Overall: Earwig's picks up quite a high risk of copyvio in one instance but I've satisfied myself that the relevant sections appear in the body of the article as cited quotations rather than plagiarisms. Each of the hooks are probably fine as they are, though I might consider some tweaks. ALT0 - I would remove the part about it becoming a hit as it seems to be common knowledge. ALT1 needs some elaboration. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 11:32, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
For ALT0, given the international audience and age of the film I wasn't sure it would be transparent that Ghostbusters was a hit film, for all readers. Sometimes I'm shocked how people have never heard of a film. Another way to phrase it is put "the blockbuster" in front of the film title and remove "but it became a major hit". Not sure how to expand ALT1 it's a complicated story. -- GreenC 15:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Earwig's picks up quite a high risk of copyvio in one instance but I've satisfied myself that the relevant sections appear in the body of the article as cited quotations rather than plagiarisms. Each of the hooks are probably fine as they are, though I might consider some tweaks. ALT0 - I would remove the part about it becoming a hit as it seems to be common knowledge. ALT1 needs some elaboration. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 11:32, 5 December 2017 (UTC)