Template:Did you know nominations/Francesca Happé
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 15:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Francesca Happé
[edit]... that Francesca Happé's 2011 Royal Society Rosalind Franklin Award Lecture was entitled "When will we understand Autism Spectrum Disorders"?
- Comment: Created during a Royal Society "Women in Science" Ada Lovelace Day edit-a-thon
Created/expanded by RGoozee (talk), Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 20:18, 20 October 2013 (UTC).
Sufficiently new and long, but whole sections are tagged as needing citations, which prevents it being used at DYK unless and until the article is properly referenced. The image also needs evidence of permission as it's previously been released under a full copyright notice so I've tagged the file at Commons. BencherliteTalk 09:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- This article has very serious close paraphrasing issues. The Research section reaches the point of unambiguous copyvio in at least one sentence, which is identical to the FN1 source aside from two omitted words. FN2 is also closely paraphrased even with the two quotes. The placement of a number of inline source citations is odd: for example, FN1 is cited at the end of the Other academic responsibilities section, where the final sentence talks about her refereeing for scientific journals, despite the fact that FN1 doesn't mention refereeing at all, and again for the Media and public engagement, where the only fact in this entire section being even somewhat supported is that there was a program about her on Channel 4, though nothing about all the details about everything else (curriculum, series, that it is a documentary, and so on). The article is going to require a top to bottom rewrite to eliminate all the paraphrasing and to properly list inline source citations for the very detailed information that has been presented. Finally, the hook is not supported by the article, and has been struck: while there's a listing in a table that she received the award, the title of the lecture does not appear in the article, and must (along with an inline cite, of course). BlueMoonset (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)