Template:Did you know nominations/First impression (psychology)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Oceanh (talk) 21:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
First impression (psychology)
[edit]- ... that first impressions can be influenced by how many people you are with?
- Comment: I think my students have added enough to this article to qualify for DYK, but if not, please excuse me.
5x expanded by Sarahay (talk). Nominated by Greta Munger (talk) at 17:18, 8 May 2014 (UTC).
- Long enough at 17,427 characters of readable prose, expanded from 1,812 chars (almost 10x) on May 8, so that's fine. No obvious problems with the article or the hook. Review to be continued. GregorB (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Inline citations used throughout, and there are no unreferenced paragraphs. The sources seem reliable, mostly psychology journals. Could not check for close paraphrasing, though, as the sources are largely offline. Could not detect other problems with the article (POV, language/style, cleanup issues).
- The hook is fine: short enough, properly formatted, interesting (better yet, intriguing), backed up by an inline ref in the text, AGF on the offline source. QPQ is not required.
Therefore, good to go. GregorB (talk) 09:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
