Template:Did you know nominations/Fireworks (1947 film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fireworks (1947 film)
[edit]- ... that the California Supreme Court reversed an obscenity charge for screening Kenneth Anger's Fireworks? Source: "The charge was contested, and the lawsuit made its way to the California Supreme Court, which upheld Rohauer's right to screen Fireworks" [1]
- Reviewed: General Examination for Women
5x expanded by Hinnk (talk). Self-nominated at 20:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC).
The article is neutral, meets the required length, and is sufficiently referenced. Article 5x expanded within seven days of this nomination. Hook is interesting and sourced. Once QPQ is done, this should be good to go. – Rhain ☔ 23:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- QPQ finished now: General Examination for Women. hinnk (talk) 05:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging Rhain to complete the review. Please note that the "Within policy" checks specified above the edit window still need to be made: neutrality of hook and article, and that the article doesn't have any copyvios or close paraphrasing. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
