The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New enough and long enough. Earwig gives 8.9% on Copyvio check, which admittedly isn't going to help with Portuguese sources. Spotchecking through Google, I can't see any issues. Referencing is good, hook fact is cited. ALT1 preferred, as it is much punchier. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)