Template:Did you know nominations/Fedotova and Others v. Russia
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fedotova and Others v. Russia
- ... that in the 2021 case Fedotova and Others v. Russia, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously ruled that lack of legal recognition for same-sex couples violated human rights? Source: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211016 "Holds, unanimously, that there has been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention in respect of all applicants"
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 01:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC).
- New article; long enough; Earwig finds no issues (just quotes and common phrases); neutral; interesting and properly cited hook. The QPQ provided has already been used here, so you'll need another one. (Kindly ping me when you've done that.) Aside from that, everything's in order: good work, as always. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oops my bad, I will use Template:Did you know nominations/Herr, unser Herr, wie bist du zugegen for QPQ. Thanks for the review! (t · c) buidhe 08:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Good to go. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
