Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Federal Reserve Bank Building (Seattle)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 19:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Federal Reserve Bank Building (Seattle)

[edit]
The Federal Reserve Bank Building in 2009
The Federal Reserve Bank Building in 2009

Created by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 00:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. The image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. I have struck ALT1 as being less interesting but any of the other hooks could be used. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I pulled this from prep because the promoted original hook was far too long at 245 characters, ALT3 was 231 characters, and ALT2 reads as if the 48-story skyscraper is a done deal ("will be"), while the article itself uses the words "proposed" and "plans". With construction not planned to start until 2018 and the number of changes to the plans over the past ten months, the building could end up being taller or shorter. A new hook (or hooks) will be needed that stays under 200 characters (including spaces) and makes no assumptions about the future. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT1a has fewer than 200 characters, the hook fact has inline citations and the hook is acceptable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Am I allowed to promote this now? All I've done was to trim the original hook, which I would have done in the prep area in the first instance if I noticed it was over 200 characters... Jolly Ω Janner 19:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I would have thought so, you didn't introduce any new facts into the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)