Template:Did you know nominations/Fathom.com

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 03:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Fathom.com

(

)

... that Columbia University failed to turn a profit on Fathom.com, an early online learning website?

Created/expanded by Ebeese (talk). Nominated by PleaseStand (talk) at 23:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

New enough and long enough at time of nomination. Article is fully supported by inline citations. (Not a huge fan of how it is done, but it is an acceptable style.) No QPQ required. File:Fathom logo.gif has a fair use rationale. Hook is properly formatted. Article reads as neutral enough. Hooked fact appears in article and is supported by citations. Some sources required putting keywords into database to spot check for plagiarism but no concerns. Check of other sources reveals no cause for concerns.
Offline source supports text and not plagiarised to write.

Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

[Edit conflict.] The article is sufficiently long and is properly referenced, though I suggest adding archive URLs to avoid link rot. The hook is the right length and is properly referenced. Looks good. — SMUconlaw (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)