Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Fallout 4: Far Harbor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Fallout 4: Far Harbor

[edit]

Created by Anarchyte (talk). Self-nominated at 13:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC).

  • Some issues found.
    • This article is new and was created on 09:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 8594 characters
    • Paragraphs [2] (At ... Harbor.),[3] (In ... Acadia.) in this article lack a citation.
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • There is possible close paraphrasing on this article with 35.5% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 109 characters
  • This is Anarchyte's' 5th nomination. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 0 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

None of the errors brought up by the bot hold any weight. The close paraphrasing is because it's a quote and the two paragraphs "unreferenced" don't need to be referenced as it's a plot section. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Checking up on the Bot Review and the feedback from Anarchyte. So I agree with everything the bot ticked as passed (Age, Length, QPQ not needed etc.)
  • I also manually checked up on the two issues it found. The "Plot" is unsourced, which seems to be the general rule of thumb for plot sections in movies, books, shows etc. and looks like in games as well so that is okay.
  • Copyright issues - Checked the tool results and it hit on a quote in the article, which is just one quote and as far as I am aware withing the allowable tolerances for Wikipedia.
  • The hook is not directly cited in the article and the article uses the term "Suposedly" for the hook, but that's not reflected in the hook. Alt1 checks out as matching the hook and being sources, so this is good to go for Alt1.
  • - Good to go.  MPJ-DK  02:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)