Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Eucalyptus rhodantha

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Eucalyptus rhodantha

[edit]
(
)

Eucalyptus rhodantha flower in Kings Park

  • ... that the leaves of the rose mallee (pictured) give it the colloquial name of "silver dollar tree"?

Created/expanded by A Willz (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 14:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

This is an article from a new student editor that I have done a bit of copyediting on. After looking through the main source, I think there is too much close paraphrasing at this time to be suitable for DYK without a major rewrite. --Melburnian (talk) 02:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
sigh - yes I see now using the paraphrasing detector. In the spirit of WP:Sofixit I am getting stuck into it now....give me a bit of timeCasliber (talk · contribs) 02:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
(groan) - yes a pretty tedious task...I need a break and will come back later. This is doable but a bit of a pain....Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Good job, it's definitely not any easy fix. --Melburnian (talk) 06:32, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Alt 1: ... that fewer than 1000 mature plants of the endangered rose mallee (pictured) remain in the wild? (I can't find anything other than the original on-line source that mentions "silver dollar tree" for this species).--Melburnian (talk) 12:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, I think it's good to go now.--Melburnian (talk) 04:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Needs new complete independent review. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Hook (ALT1): Interesting, short enough, cited. Image is fine
Article: New enough, long enough, referencing looks good. Paraphrasing needs a bit more work, methinks
Summary: A bit more paraphrasing work needed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:33, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Yeah I figured we might need to - will get onto it soon. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I did some and was debating on how much more to do for it to be acceptable. I've been flat out juggling a ton of activities. I will take one last look in the next twelve hours. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
  • update - I think I've done enough now. Some bits that are close to the source in wording I can't think of a rephrase that doesn't change the meaning. Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Ready to go. AGF on offline source. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Eucalyptus_rhodantha&oldid=829009750"