The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Created by Kaldari (talk). Self-nominated at 06:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC).
Article is long enough at 1703 ch and posted by due date. However, the first section of the article needs a citation. Hook is interesting. Text is neutral and there are no copy vio issues. QPQ done.Nvvchar. 13:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The first section is basically a summary/lead (although the article isn't yet divided into sections). There should be adequate citations to back it up in the rest of the article (per WP:LEADCITE). Kaldari (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The dates in the first section any way need verification as they are not repeated in the rest of the article. The section as presented now cannot be considered as a lead sectionNvvchar. 01:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
I've added section headings and citations as needed to address these issues. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Article is long enough at 1703 ch and posted by due date. However, the first section of the article needs a citation. Hook is interesting. Text is neutral and there are no copy vio issues. QPQ done.Nvvchar. 13:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
I've added section headings and citations as needed to address these issues. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Could use a picture. I'll see what I can do. Andrew D. (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)