Template:Did you know nominations/Embassy of Portugal, Bangkok
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Embassy of Portugal, Bangkok
[edit].JPG)
Portuguese ambassador's residence, Bangkok
- ... that the offices of the Portuguese Embassy in Bangkok are located in an old warehouse? Source: [1] (in Thai, but also supported by this one: "Originally a warehouse, the wooden building was converted into embassy offices back in 2006."[2])
- ALT1:... that the Portuguese ambassador's residence (pictured), built in 1860, is the oldest diplomatic residence in Bangkok? Source: [3] (right at the bottom)
- Reviewed: Almasbek Akmatov
- Comment: Image for ALT1 only. If you spotted the discrepancy in the warehouse's date of renovation, that's because I chose to follow the date given at [4] as likely more reliable.
Created by Paul_012 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC).
New, interesting, well-written, QPQ checked, copyvio checked, all fine. I'd prefer ALT1. May I suggest to add the reference to the intro, where you state the fact you use in the blurb? Well done. Tone 18:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. The fact is repeated and cited later in the article, but I've added the citations to the lead as well, for clarity's sake. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote the first hook, but I think it's misleading. It sounds like it's literally in an "old warehouse", but the article says the building was redesigned and won awards. I'm wondering if you could use a different adjective, like "wooden warehouse", "century-old warehouse", etc. Tell me if I'm being too nitpicky here. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Well, Yoninah, the building is indeed old (as in age if not condition), and was built as a warehouse, so I don't really think it's out of line for DYK. But I see how the reader might get the wrong message. I'd be fine with "century-old warehouse", but sources don't say exactly how old the warehouse is (though it's very presumably over a hundred years old). Perhaps clarifying it as being in "a renovated old warehouse" would be more precise (though less "hooky", IMO). (Side note: The award was won by the residence, not the former-warehouse office building.) --Paul_012 (talk) 07:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
