Template:Did you know nominations/Elder Village
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Elder Village
[edit]- ... that Elder Villages are a part of the "aging in place" movement?
Created by Piledhigheranddeeper (talk). Self nominated at 13:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC).
- Reviewed: Peter Cross (rugby union)
- Reviewed: Women in photography
- I'm currently reviewing this article. I'll be back soon with any suggestions or comments! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I've completed the copyright check and corrected a slightly too close paraphrase in one spot. However, there is a {{citation needed}}on the hook fact, which will need to be corrected before this can be featured on the main page. Additionally, the final sentence, "Established jointly by NCB Capital Impact and Beacon Hill Village, and developed in response to requests from Villages nationwide, the VtV network serves as a clearinghouse for inter-Village communications and helps communities establish and operate their own Villages", looks slightly too promotional for an article that will be featured on the main page. Once these two issues are corrected, you should be good to go. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- The "citation needed" was actually for the last line of that paragraph, now removed; final sentence re-written.--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Alright! It looks good now, so I'm passing the article. Thanks for your contributions! Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This was accidentally promoted at the same time it was approved but not placed in a prep area, so it was never run. Reversing the promotion so it can be promoted in the usual way by an independent set assembler. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
