Template:Did you know nominations/El Gran Carlemany
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
El Gran Carlemany
[edit]- ... that "El Gran Carlemany", the national anthem of Andorra, proclaims the microstate as the "only remaining daughter of the Carolingian empire"?
ALT1: ... that "El Gran Carlemany", the national anthem of Andorra, celebrates the microstate's status as the "last remaining daughter of the Carolingian Empire"?- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hadidjah
5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self nominated at 17:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC).
Checks out, new, long, within policy. Hook should be quoted accordingly: ALT2: ... "El Gran Carlemany", the national anthem of Andorra, celebrates it as the "only remaining daughter of the Carolingian Empire"?.--Zoupan 01:01, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- This review needs more details, in accordance with DYK review instructions Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYKReviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Expanded on 7 May, it is long enough, and hook is within policy with 131 char. and reference (see this for quoting). However, the hook should be quoted accordingly:
- ALT2:
... that "El Gran Carlemany", the national anthem of Andorra, celebrates it as "the only remaining daughter of the Carolingian empire"?--Zoupan 22:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- ALT2:
- Now that the original hook uses "only" rather than last, as ALT2 does, the hooks are ready for review, and a more complete review of the article, including neutrality and close paraphrasing checks, needs to be done. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced. No close paraphrasing seen. Original hook ref is verified and cited inline; I tweaked the quote to print it exactly as it appears in the source, and also edited the article accordingly. QPQ done. Original hook good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)