Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Eklakhi Mausoleum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Eklakhi Mausoleum

[edit]
Eklakhi Mausoleum
Eklakhi Mausoleum
  • ... that the Eklakhi Mausoleum (pictured) represents a village hut with a sloping roof and serves as a prototype for the monuments built during the Bengal Sultanate?

Created by Royroydeb (talk). Self-nominated at 16:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC).

  •  Doing... -Nizil (talk) 05:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
First notes: @Royroydeb:, the article is classified as a stub, reassess it. The article need some copyedit and reorganisation. -Nizil (talk) 05:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
There is potential better hook telling it was the first square building with single dome. The current hook is bit long and not much interesting to wider audience.-Nizil (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I have tried to copyedit the article. If it is not enough, then it will be requested at GOCER. The new hook is
  • ALT1:... that the Eklakhi Mausoleum (pictured) was the first square-shaped building with a single dome built in India?

@Nizil Shah:. RRD (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

I have done some copyediting. Reassessment done and issues resolved. I did a minor correction in ALT1 hook. Offline source for hook considered in good faith. New, long enough, inline cited, QPQ done. Image is free, used in article and will look good in 100x100. ASI website tells "Amongst the three graves inside, one is regarded as tomb of Sultan Jalaluddin, son of Raja Kans, the other two of his wife and son Ahmad Shah. There is divergence of opinion among scholars about the identification and orientation of the graves." It is very important thing that the the identification of graves is disputed and should be covered in the article.-Nizil (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
I have now made the required change. RRD (talk) 15:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
@Royroydeb: All issues resolved. ALT1 approved. Minor tweaks done. Thank you.-Nizil (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)