Template:Did you know nominations/Edward S. Harkness House

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by DimensionalFusion talk 20:22, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Edward S. Harkness House

(

)

The Edward S. Harkness House

... that when the Edward S. Harkness House was built, its owner took the address from his neighbor? Source: Gray, Christopher (September 20, 1992). "Streetscapes: Sidestreet Prestige; When Cachet Was Off 5th Ave". The New York Times.
- ALT1: ... that when the Edward S. Harkness House was built, the address of the neighboring building had to be changed? Source: Gray, Christopher (September 20, 1992). "Streetscapes: Sidestreet Prestige; When Cachet Was Off 5th Ave". The New York Times.
- ALT2: ... that stained-glass windows at the Edward S. Harkness House were meant to cover up a blank wall? Source: "A Dignified Type of the City House". The New York Architect. Vol. 5, no. 3. March 1911. p. 32.
- ALT3: ... that the design of the Edward S. Harkness House was once described as being "entirely free from exaggeration"? Source: The New York Architect 1911, p. 31.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Allison Reese

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 675 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC).

General eligibility:
New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The picture is fine and available to use, I see no sourcing issues with the article, its expansion is new enough, and I see no other problems preventing this from becoming a DYK. The first hook is the best one. @Epicgenius: Jon698 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)