Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Hutchinson Synge
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Edward Hutchinson Synge
[edit]... that one of the first applications of nanotechnology, an incredibly accurate theory of the near-field scanning optical microscope, was described by Edward Hutchinson Synge in a letter to Albert Einstein in 1928?
- Donegan, J.F. (2012). The Life and Works of Edward Hutchinson Synge (co-edited with D. Weaire and P. Florides), Pöllauberg, Austria : Living Edition, ISBN 3901585176 Donegan, J.F. (2012). The Life and Works of Edward Hutchinson Synge (co-edited with D. Weaire and P. Florides), Pöllauberg, Austria : Living Edition, ISBN 3901585176
Created by Toploftical (talk). Self-nominated at 04:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC).
- - Length, Date, QPQ exempt, and Earwigs check. Offline refs accepted AGF. Mifter (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Toploftical and Mifter: I've made some adjustments to the article and hook; I wouldn't call this "one of the first applications of nanotechnology" since it was solely a theoretical description that wasn't reduced to practice until several decades later. I'm suggesting the following, very similar hook. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Edward Hutchinson Synge described a theory for a near-field scanning optical microscope in a letter to Albert Einstein fifty years before various corporations sought patents on the technology?
- @Toploftical and Mifter: I've made some adjustments to the article and hook; I wouldn't call this "one of the first applications of nanotechnology" since it was solely a theoretical description that wasn't reduced to practice until several decades later. I'm suggesting the following, very similar hook. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- ALT1 approved. I reworked it to try and make it more interesting and have it not be in the passive voice. Mifter (talk) 00:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)