The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 01:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
... that Gagauz politician Dumitru Topciu(pictured) was mocked by his colleagues in the Romanian Assembly of Deputies for speaking Romanian with a "boorish accent"? Source: Ion Dimitrescu, "Parlamentul a început discuția validărilor. Camera. Preludiu și uvertură la simfonia Destinderii", in Curentul, February 7, 1934, p. 7.
ALT1: ... that Dumitru Topciu(pictured), a Gagauz member of the Romanian Assembly of Deputies, objected to having "Mohammedan teachers" educate Gagauz children? Source: "Corpurile legiuitoare. Ședințele de la 27 Ianuarie. Comunicări", in Universul, January 30, 1937, p. 6
ALT2: ... that Gagauz politician Dumitru Topciu(pictured) helped Romania's far-right canvass "massive support" in minority-inhabited parts of Bessarabia? Source: Ivan Duminică, "Chapter Sixteen. Policy Options of the Bulgarians of Bessarabia during 1918–1940", in Sorin Radu, Oliver Schmitt (eds.), Politics and Peasants in Interwar Romania: Perceptions, Mentalities, Propaganda, p. 529. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. ISBN1-4438-9383-8
Overall: Approve all three hooks. My favorite is ALT1. BorgQueen (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Just one question though... @Dahn: I see the ALT2 fact in the article's lede ("Touring the Budjak subregion, he had a major contribution in canvassing Gagauz votes for Romania's far-right groups.") but can't easily find the info in the relevant section of the article. Where is it? BorgQueen (talk) 06:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
@BorgQueen: Please search the text for "massive support" (without the quote marks, though), which is part of a direct quote (mention of his canvassing is scattered across several other paragraphs, but that quote should anchor the more relevant part). Dahn (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Ah, OK, good to go. BorgQueen (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)