Template:Did you know nominations/Drosophila subobscura
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Drosophila subobscura
- ALT0... that Drosophila subobscura has been regarded as a model organism for its use in evolutionary-biological studies? Source: Krimbas, C.B. & Loukas,M.(1980) Inversion Polymorphism of Drosophila subobscura Evol.Biol.12,163-234.
- ALT1... that Drosophila subobscura males perform elaborate courship dances to win over females? Source: "Smith, J.M. J Genet (1956) 54: 261". doi:10.1007/BF02982781
- ALT2... that the genome of Drosophila subobscura has been used to track global climate change? Source: "Balanyá, J., Oller JM, Raymond BH, George GW, Serra1 L., Global Genetic Change Tracks Global Climate Warming in Drosophila subobscura. (2006)". Retrieved 30 September 2019.
- ALT3... that the gut bacteria of Drosophila subobscura can influence its mating behavior? Source: "Gut microbiota influences female choice and fecundity in the nuptial gift-giving species, Drosophila subobscura (Diptera: Drosophilidae". Retrieved 24 September 2019.
- ALT2... that the genome of Drosophila subobscura has been used to track global climate change? Source: "Balanyá, J., Oller JM, Raymond BH, George GW, Serra1 L., Global Genetic Change Tracks Global Climate Warming in Drosophila subobscura. (2006)". Retrieved 30 September 2019.
- ALT1... that Drosophila subobscura males perform elaborate courship dances to win over females? Source: "Smith, J.M. J Genet (1956) 54: 261". doi:10.1007/BF02982781
5x expanded by Andrewoh29 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC).
Several statements in the article are currently unreferenced; while technically the DYK rules only require at least one citation per paragraph, the fact that several sentences lack footnotes is putting the article at risk of being pulled if it gets promoted as is. In addition, ALT0 is probably the more interesting of the two hooks as ALT1 is very common in the animal kingdom; however, the article seems vague on the meaning of "model organism", so it may be need to be verified. I will give this the full review once the sourcing issues have been addressed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your feedback! I agree with your comment about clarifying the "model organism" meaning. However, regarding your comment about the article being under-referenced, the article is heavily referenced. When a footnote is introduced, all consecutive sentences that follow the cited sentence tie back to the cited footnote, until a new footnote is introduced. In that respect, the "lack of footnotes" that you reported are simply "implied footnotes" from the most recently cited footnote in the passage. With that, every sentence in the article is cited and is from a reference.
Thank you for sharing! andrewoh29 19:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- While that's technically true, in practice it's recommended that references go at the end of paragraphs instead of the middle, if they're intended to cite the whole passage. And in the past, several articles have been pulled from DYK because of situations similar to this article's, which is why I'm being cautious this time. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Okay. I have gone ahead and made the citation fixes to the best of my ability. Thank you for your feedback! andrewoh29 15:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. The article looks a lot better now. I see that you've suggested new hooks above; however you completely removed the original hooks. What I would suggest is to still metnion the original hooks, and that the new ALT0 and ALT1 (i.e. the hooks about the genome and gut bacteria respectively) be retitled as "ALT2" and "ALT3". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Done! I appreciate for your continued feedback! Slowly learning how all of this operates. andrewoh29 10:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. The article looks a lot better now. I see that you've suggested new hooks above; however you completely removed the original hooks. What I would suggest is to still metnion the original hooks, and that the new ALT0 and ALT1 (i.e. the hooks about the genome and gut bacteria respectively) be retitled as "ALT2" and "ALT3". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Okay. I have gone ahead and made the citation fixes to the best of my ability. Thank you for your feedback! andrewoh29 15:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
5x expansion verified, no close paraphrasing found. No QPQ needed for new student editor with less than 5 DYK credits. ALT2 and ALT3 are the most interesting suggestions: I'm sorry for not clarifying this earlier, but sentences that mention hook facts still need to be referenced, even if the reference is already mentioned elsewhere in the relevant paragraph. While ALT3 is interesting, as far as I can tell the section that discusses it only implies it and doesn't explicitly mention it; it would likely be a good idea to have a more explicit (and referenced) mention somewhere in the article, either in the lead section or at the start of that section. The sources for the article are offline and I have no access to them so I am assuming good faith on their reliability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello! I have tried and make your revisions to the best of my ability. You mentioned that you have no access to the sources on the article? I can access them just fine on my end, when I click their respective hyperlinks in the reference section. Let me know. andrewoh29 22:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- A readily available source is ideal, but it's not necessary and if there are any concerns about reliability, usually the burden of proof lies not with the one who questions. In any case, I think there are still some minor typos in the article, but those could easily be resolved before this is promoted, and as the concerns I raised above have been addressed, so I am now passing this nomination.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- A readily available source is ideal, but it's not necessary and if there are any concerns about reliability, usually the burden of proof lies not with the one who questions. In any case, I think there are still some minor typos in the article, but those could easily be resolved before this is promoted, and as the concerns I raised above have been addressed, so I am now passing this nomination.
- Hello! I have tried and make your revisions to the best of my ability. You mentioned that you have no access to the sources on the article? I can access them just fine on my end, when I click their respective hyperlinks in the reference section. Let me know. andrewoh29 22:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
