Template:Did you know nominations/Dorkovo Museum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by North America1000 07:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dorkovo Museum
[edit]
Model of a mastodon
- ... that the Dorkovo Museum, a domed wooden structure, displays fossils from the Pliocene era of about five million years ago, including a life-size model of a mastodon (pictured)?
Created by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 02:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC).
: The article is long and new enough. The hook's also interesting which is cited immediately after it within the article body. There's a little close para issue shown here and should be resolved. Also, please consider putting the citations in required places. In other words, not all sentences of the first para of the 'History' section are supported by the three citations. Same thing is true about the 'Features' section. --Mhhossein (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- MhhosseinThanks for the review. I have re-fixed the references. With regard to the close paraphrasing issue I may point out that the sentences marked in the above reference are of Varshets and not Dorkovo. Most of the words bolded there are proper names and figures. Will you please point out the exact sentence which needs fixing? I will be happy to comply.Nvvchar. 05:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome, looking at the article more precisely, I see that there's no close para issue and what I raised above was just the title of a ref being used exactly in the ref list which is natural and mandatory! Sorry for this. Anyway, I'd like to say that the issue with citations is fixed now and that I see no more problems. The image licensing status seems OK to me. Good to go by this. --Mhhossein (talk) 06:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
