The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ready in my opinion, though I'm far from a regular here at DYK. Very important subject, I hope it is officially scheduled asap. Feoffer (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
@Feoffer: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. An optional Reviewer's Template is located above the edit window. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 15:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Just a note - this image is not used in the article, but it is a cropped version of the main image of the article. starship.paint (talk) 02:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@Starship.paint: someone added this note on the talk page of this template:
The fact they were peaceful should be included. -- Valjean (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Looks perfect to me! Feoffer (talk) 01:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Looks good. -- Valjean (talk) 02:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
@Feoffer: Please review the new hook, ALT3, for inline cite and close paraphrasing, and then give it a new tick. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 10:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
@Feoffer: thank you. BTW since you already reviewed the nomination, you just have to review a couple of the criteria for a new hook. Yoninah (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
@Starship.paint: Something sounds POV to me about calling them "peaceful protestors" instead of "a peaceful protest". I suggest this alt:
@Yoninah: - for the tag, unfortunately the source doesn't say by whom, so I can't answer that, but I've tried to reword the sentence to clarify that it was part of the federal response. See below for the hook, thanks for catching that. starship.paint (talk) 13:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)