Template:Did you know nominations/Discrimination based on nationality
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Discrimination based on nationality
- ... that discrimination based on nationality is an exception to anti-discrimination laws in many countries? Source: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09240519211055648
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 08:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC).
Pass: article is fully eligible—itself well-written, free of copyright violations or plagiarism, and adequately cited. QPQ done. Hook strikes me as super interesting, and is also verified by source. I do wish to note however that the article is presently involved in a merge discussion, so perhaps that would have to be cleared up before this gets queued. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 02:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Putting this on hold until a merge discussion is completed. Z1720 (talk) 22:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- Z1720 There is no active merge discussion, just one user who (mis)placed a merge tag with a bad rationale. (t · c) buidhe 22:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- No active merge discussion? Then what's going on at Talk:Xenophobia#Proposed merge of Discrimination based on nationality into Xenophobia? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 09:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- theleekycauldron What's an active discussion vs an inactive one? Only two comments (one in favor, one opposed), last comment was almost 2 weeks ago. No sign of consensus developing to merge. The rationale is poorly thought out as well. (t · c) buidhe 14:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- An active merge discussion is any good-faith merge proposal that has not been closed by an uninvolved editor. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 22:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- theleekycauldron What's an active discussion vs an inactive one? Only two comments (one in favor, one opposed), last comment was almost 2 weeks ago. No sign of consensus developing to merge. The rationale is poorly thought out as well. (t · c) buidhe 14:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- No active merge discussion? Then what's going on at Talk:Xenophobia#Proposed merge of Discrimination based on nationality into Xenophobia? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 09:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Z1720 There is no active merge discussion, just one user who (mis)placed a merge tag with a bad rationale. (t · c) buidhe 22:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Discussions don't need to be formally closed. If you think so, theleekycauldron, why not close it yourself? I think it's unreasonable to shut down a DYK over any request regardless of its likelihood of actually being implemented. (t · c) buidhe 00:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well, the merge tag certainly can't be summarily removed by the author of the article. I've restored it – I can't close the discussion, because I've weighed in. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
